Category Archives: Council District 10

2.7.6. Butcher Pen Creek

2.7.6.1. About Butcher Pen Creek

Figure 2.35 Butcher Pen Creek (WBID 2322) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
Figure 2.35 Butcher Pen Creek (WBID 2322) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
    • A tributary of the Cedar River
    • Primary Land Use: Residential
    • Current TMDL reports:
      Fecal Coliform with BMAP
    • Not included in 2022 Verified List of Impaired Waters
    • WBID Area: 1.31 sq. miles

    Beneficial Use: Class III F
    (Recreational – Freshwater)

2.7.6.2. Data sources

Data were historically downloaded from the FL STORET website (DEP 2010f), with recent data downloaded from WIN WAVES (DEP 2022f). Data were filtered based on the stations in the Butcher Pen Creek WBID 2322 (DEP 2023b) shown above. The filtered dataset reflects water column concentrations and was used to generate Table 2.11.

2.7.6.3. Discussion

Water quality data for Butcher Pen Creek are shown in Table 2.11. Historical phosphorus levels were higher than the recently updated WQC (DEP 2015c; DEP 2016d; DEP 2016i), and recent average total phosphorus levels remain at or above the WQC.  Chlorophyll-a levels far exceeded the WQC in 2022. Butcher Pen Creek was previously considered impaired for chlorophyll-a, but it was delisted in 2016 (DEP 2016f).  Butcher Pen Creek is impaired for Dissolved Oxygen based on the number of exceedances and the number of measurements taken, but it was not included on the 2020 or 2022 Verified List of Impaired Waters (DEP 2020e). High nutrient levels were previously identified as the causative pollutant for reduced dissolved oxygen levels, but during the last assessment period, Butcher Pen Creek was not considered impaired for nutrients.  As a result, Butcher Pen Creek was added to the Study List to identify the causative agent. Average dissolved oxygen concentrations have been above the WQC on average from 2020-2022, but more than 10% of samples taken are below the WQC. The average concentration of iron also exceeded the WQC in 2022.

A TMDL report was published in 2005 in response to average fecal coliform levels exceeding the WQC (Wainwright 2005a) to address this issue, with an 83% reduction of current anthropogenic fecal coliform loading. Subsequently, a BMAP to address this issue was legally adopted (DEP 2009b). Fecal coliform levels have remained high, with average fecal indicator bacteria levels more than three times the WQC.  In 2018, FDEP piloted microbial source tracking strategies in selected impaired waterbodies.  They found that the strategies used could be used to narrow down areas suspected of containing sources that actively contribute fecal indicating bacteria to water in order to identify and remediate them, but this work is resource-intensive.  Butcher Pen Creek was found to have known sources of untreated human waste present (DEP 2019a). In 2020, Butcher Pen Creek was added to FDEP’s study list to monitor the response in fecal coliform (E. coli) levels to ongoing restoration activities taking place as part of the existing BMAP (DEP 2020f).  Additional information about fecal coliform in the tributaries can be found in Section 2.6 and Table 2.3.

Historical water quality data for Butcher Pen Creek are available in previous versions of the River Report.

Table 2.11 Water quality data for Butcher Pen Creek.

 

Water QualityAverage and Number of Samples º
ParameterCriteria (FW)202020212022
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)≥34% sat. (≥3.0)4.28
(9 of 25 samples)
5.81
(4 of 30 samples)
5.73 ± 0.31
(6 of 46 samples)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)<0.120.16
(2 of 3 samples)
0.14
(6 of 10 samples)
1.19 ± 0.13
(2 of 13 samples)
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)<1.54Not availableNot available0.16 ± 0.01
(10 of 13 samples)
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)<203.68
(0 of 2 samples)
17.90
(3 of 10 samples)
38.72 ± 8.93
(10 of 13 samples)
Arsenic (µg/L)≤50Not available1.06
(0 of 5 samples)
1.06 ± 0.13
(0 of 11 samples)
Cadmium (µg/L)≤0.3Not available0.01
(0 of 5 samples)
0.01 ± 0.000
(0 of 11 samples)
Copper (µg/L)≤9.3Not available1.22
(0 of 5 samples)
1.01 ± 0.09
(0 of 11 samples)
Iron (µg/L)≤1Not included in
2021 SORR
Not included in
2021 SORR
1.29 ± 0.08
(9 of 11 samples)
Lead (µg/L)≤3.2Not available0.50
(0 of 5 samples)
0.39 ± 0.05
(0 of 11 samples)
Nickel (µg/L)≤52Not available1.25
(0 of 5 samples)
1.16 ± 0.09
(0 of 11 samples)
Silver (µg/L)≤0.07Not available0.01
(0 of 5 samples)
0.00 ± 0.000
(0 of 11 samples)
Zinc (µg/L)≤120Not available12.5
(0 of 5 samples)
11.59 ± 0.91
(0 of 11 samples)
Fecal Indicator Bacteria
(E. Coli) (CFU/100 mL)
<4101520
(18 of 24 samples)
3030
(20 of 21 samples)
1393 ± 240
(16 of 23 samples)
Turbidity (NTU)<2914.23
(0 of 3 samples)
8.29
(0 of 10 samples)
6.02 ± 0.54
(0 of 13 samples)
Note: Hardness-dependent freshwater criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were generated based on a hardness concentration of 100 mg/L.
° = Number of samples below Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen; Number of samples above Water Quality Criteria for all other parameters.
FW = freshwater; SW = saltwater (marine). Values denoted with (*) indicate a proposed criterion, which has not yet been adopted.
Values denoted with (‡) are reference values based on EPA criteria (EPA 2010b), but the water body is not regulated by this standard.

2.7.7. Cedar River

2.7.7.1. About the Cedar River

Figure 2.36 The Cedar River Tributary (WBID 2262B and 2213P2) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
Figure 2.36 The Cedar River Tributary (WBID 2262B and 2213P2) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
    • At the I-10/I-295 Interchange
    • Primary Land Use: Residential/Forested
    • Current TMDL reports:
      Fecal Coliform (2262B, 2213P) and DO/Nutrients (2213P)
    • 2022 Verified Impairment for
      Fecal coliform ( coli) (2262B) and Iron (2213P2)
    • WBID Area: 22.8 sq. mi.

    Beneficial Use: Class III F/M
    (2262B Recreational – Freshwater, 2213P2 Recreational – Marine)

2.7.7.2. Data sources

Data were historically downloaded from the FL STORET website (DEP 2010f), with recent data downloaded from WIN WAVES (DEP 2022f). Data were filtered based on the stations in the Cedar River WBID 2262B (freshwater) and 2213P2 (marine) (DEP 2023b) shown above. The filtered dataset reflects water column concentrations and was used to generate Table 2.12.

2.7.7.3. Discussion

Water quality data for the Cedar River are shown in Table 2.12. The Cedar River feeds into the Ortega River and thus is not directly a tributary of the St. Johns River. Even so, the Cedar River is tidal in nature, varying in height by ~1 ft over the course of a day (SJRWMD 2010d). Average total phosphorus levels had been lower than the reference value (DEP 2015c; DEP 2016d; DEP 2016i).  However, the average total phosphorus level 2020-2022 was near the reference value, with approximately half of samples exceeding the WQC, especially in the marine reach (2213P2). Average chlorophyll-a levels in the Cedar River were well above the WQC in the marine reach (2213P2) from 2020 through 2022. The marine reach (WBID 2213P2) had average copper and iron levels 2020-2022 near or exceeding the WQC.  The Cedar River was listed as Impaired for high levels of iron in 2016 and 2022 (DEP 2016h; DEP 2020e; DEP 2022).

In 2004, Cedar River was identified as being impaired for both fecal and total coliform, and as a result, a TMDL report was finalized in 2006 (Magley 2006b), with an 83% reduction of current anthropogenic fecal coliform loading. (Note: the data analyses in the TMDL are based on different criteria than that used in this report). Currently, a Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) to address this impairment is under development, but the timeframe for its release is currently unknown.  In 2020, Cedar River was verified as Impaired for fecal coliform based on the number of exceedances for the sample size (DEP 2020g).  FDEP confirmed anthropogenic sources for these bacteria using genetic marker analysis and chemical tracer data.  Average E. coli levels exceeded the WQC 2020-2022.

No recent measurements were available in WIN or STORET between 2020 and 2022 for the freshwater reach (WBID 2262B) for the following parameters: Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Nickel, Silver, Zinc.

Historical water quality data for the Cedar River are available in previous versions of the River Report.

Table 2.12 Water quality data for the Cedar River.

Water QualityAverage and Number of Samples º
ParameterCriteria (FW)202020212022
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)≥34% sat. (≥3.0) FW7.12
(0 of 9 samples)
7.50
(0 of 12 samples)
6.61 ± 0.48
(0 of 11 samples)
≥4.0 SW6.38
(2 of 15 samples)
6.20
(1 of 27 samples)
6.64 ± 0.47
(2 of 18 samples)
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)<1.54 FWNot availableNot available1.28 ± 0.10
(0 of 4 samples)
<1.54 SW1.00 ± 0.15
(0 of 3 samples)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)<0.12 FW0.14
(9 of 14 samples)
0.11
(6 of 16 samples)
0.12 ± 0.01
(1 of 4 samples)
<0.12 SW0.16 ± 0.01
(3 of 3 samples)
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)<20 FW7.35
(0 of 4 samples)
6.13
(0 of 4 samples)
9.50 ± 4.54
(0 of 3 samples)
<5.4 SW25.05
(9 of 10 samples)
32.72
(9 of 9 samples)
34.22 ± 18.05
(3 of 3 samples)
Arsenic (µg/L)≤503.01
(0 of 10 samples)
2.66
(0 of 8 samples)
1.96 ± 0.24
(0 of 8 samples)
Cadmium (µg/L)≤8.8 SW0.12
(0 of 10 samples)
0.08
(0 of 8 samples)
0.08 ± 0.04
(0 of 8 samples)
Copper (µg/L)≤3.7 SW4.07
(5 of 10 samples)
3.48
(3 of 8 samples)
3.62 ± 1.01
(2 of 8 samples)
Iron (mg/L)≤0.3 SW0.44
(8 of 10 samples)
0.45
(7 of 8 samples)
0.34 ± 0.04
(3 of 8 samples)
Lead (µg/L)≤8.5 SW2.97
(0 of 10 samples)
3.19
(0 of 8 samples)
1.96 ± 0.35
(0 of 8 samples)
Nickel (µg/L)≤8.3 SW1.80
(0 of 10 samples)
1.59
(0 of 8 samples)
1.53 ± 0.28
(0 of 8 samples)
Silver (µg/L)≤0.92 SW0.11
(0 of 10 samples)
0.07
(0 of 8 samples)
0.04 ± 0.03
(0 of 8 samples)
Zinc (µg/L)≤86 SW22.00
(0 of 10 samples)
23.50
(0 of 8 samples)
18.12 ± 2.75
(0 of 8 samples)
Fecal Indicator Bacteria (E. coli) (CFU/100 mL)E. coli <410 FW6900
(6 of 16 samples)
1630
(16 of 23 samples)
1848 ± 776
(7 of 12 samples)
E. coli <410 SW641 ± 397
(2 of 4 samples)
Enterococci <130 SW17 ± 12
(0 of 2 samples)
Turbidity (NTU)<29 FW6.58
(0 of 14 samples)
11.60
(0 of 12 samples)
12.43 ± 5.21
(0 of 4 samples)
<29 SW9.20 ± 3.39
(0 of 3 samples)
Note: Hardness-dependent freshwater criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were generated based on a hardness concentration of 100 mg/L.
° = Number of samples below Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen; Number of samples above Water Quality Criteria for all other parameters.
FW = freshwater; SW = saltwater (marine). Values denoted with (*) indicate a proposed criterion, which has not yet been adopted.
Values denoted with (‡) are reference values based on EPA criteria (EPA 2010b), but the water body is not regulated by this standard.

2.7.22. Ortega River

2.7.22.1. About the Ortega River

Figure 2.51 The Ortega River Tributary (WBID 2213P1 and 2249A) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
Figure 2.51 The Ortega River Tributary (WBID 2213P1 and 2249A) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
    • West of NAS Jacksonville
    • Primary Land Use: Residential
    • Current TMDL reports:
      Fecal Coliform (2213P), DO/Nutrient (2213P)
    • 2022 Verified Impairment for Fecal coliform ( coli) (2249A)
    • WBID Area: 29.0 sq. mi.
    • Beneficial Use: Class III F/M

    (2213P1 Recreational – Marine, 2249A Recreational – Freshwater)

2.7.22.2. Data sources

Data were historically downloaded from the FL STORET website (DEP 2010f), with recent data downloaded from WIN WAVES (DEP 2022f). Data were filtered based on the stations in the Ortega River WBID 2213P1 (marine) and 2249A (freshwater) (DEP 2023b) shown above. The filtered dataset reflects water column concentrations and was used to generate Table 2.27.

2.7.22.3. Discussion

Water quality data for the Ortega River are shown in Table 2.27. Average total phosphorus and dissolved oxygen concentrations were within acceptable limits in the freshwater reach (2249A), but outside of WQC for the marine reach (2213P1). Average chlorophyll-a concentrations have remained lower than the WQC in the freshwater reach of the Ortega River, but chlorophyll-a concentrations in the marine reach exceeded or were near the WQC from 2020-2022. Very few samples were available to assess in 2022. All samples 2020-2022 had metals concentrations lower than the WQC.

Average fecal indicator bacteria measurements were below the WQC in 2020 and 2022, and exceeded it in 2021, while roughly one-quarter to one-third of the individual samples exceeded the WQC. The TMDL reports for fecal coliform (Rhew 2009f) and DO/Nutrients (Magley 2009b) published in 2009 referred to WBID 2213P, of which WBID 2213P1 is a subset as a result of changes to the WBID boundaries.  In 2022, the freshwater reach of the Ortega River was verified as Impaired for elevated levels of fecal coliform (E. coli) based on the number of exceedances for the sample size, and anthropogenic sources of E. coli have been identified (DEP 2020g; DEP 2022).

Historical water quality data for the Ortega River are available in previous versions of the River Report. 

Table 2.27 Water quality data for the Ortega River.

Water QualityAverage and Number of Samples º
ParameterCriteria202020212022
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)≥34% sat. (≥3.0) FW6.59
(2 of 16 samples)
7.39
(1 of 15 samples)
5.48 ± 0.45
(2 of 17 samples)
≥4.0 SW6.7
(0 of 9 samples)
6.05
(0 of 5 samples)
3.11 ± 0.54
(2 of 2 samples)
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)<1.54 FW1.01
(0 of 4 samples)
Not available1.29 ± 0.31
(2 of 6 samples)
<1.54 SW0.97 ± 0.05
(0 of 2 samples)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)<0.12 FW0.09
(2 of 13 samples)
0.06
(0 of 13 samples)
0.08 ± 0.01
(0 of 6 samples)
<0.12 SW0.14 ± 0.02
(1 of 2 samples)
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)<20 FW0.86
(0 of 7 samples)
0.78
(0 of 7 samples)
1.33 ± 0.30
(0 of 6 samples)
<5.4 SW36.4
(5 of 5 samples)
28.00
(3 of 3 samples)
5.16 ± 3.24
(1 of 2 samples)
Arsenic (¬µg/L)≤50 FW1.51
(0 of 10 samples)
1.08
(0 of 3 samples)
2.75 ± 0.000
(0 of 3 samples)
≤50 SWNot availableNot available
Cadmium (¬µg/L)≤0.3 FW0.03
(0 of 6 samples)
0.03
(0 of 3 samples)
0.03 ± 0.000
(0 of 3 samples)
≤8.8 SW0.01
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Copper (¬µg/L)≤9.3 FW2.93
(0 of 6 samples)
2.75
(0 of 3 samples)
6.13 ± 1.85
(0 of 3 samples)
≤3.7 SW2.61
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Iron (mg/L)≤1.0 FWNot included in
2021 SORR
Not included in
2022 SORR
0.59 ± 0.15
(0 of 3 samples)
≤0.3 SWNot included in
2021 SORR
Not availableNot available
Lead (¬µg/L)≤3.2 FW0.32
(0 of 6 samples)
0.39
(0 of 3 samples)
0.50 ± 0.13
(0 of 3 samples)
≤8.5 SW1.65
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Nickel (¬µg/L)≤52 FW0.25
(0 of 6 samples)
0.25
(0 of 3 samples)
1.92 ± 0.83
(0 of 3 samples)
≤8.3 SW1
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Silver (¬µg/L)≤0.07 FW0.03
(0 of 6 samples)
0.03
(0 of 3 samples)
0.03 ± 0.000
(0 of 3 samples)
≤0.92 SW0.01
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Zinc (¬µg/L)≤120 FW15
(0 of 6 samples)
10.83
(0 of 3 samples)
27.5 ± 0.000
(0 of 3 samples)
≤86 SW7.5
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Fecal Indicator Bacteria (CFU/100 mL)E. coli <410 FW330
(3 of 14 samples)
620
(3 of 10 samples)
275 ± 67
(3 of 12 samples)
Enterococci <130 SWNot availableNot available
Turbidity (NTU)<29 FW5.19
(0 of 15 samples)
3.31
(0 of 7 samples)
3.62 ± 1.06
(0 of 6 samples)
<29 SWNot availableNot available
Note: Hardness-dependent freshwater criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were generated based on a hardness concentration of 100 mg/L.
° = Number of samples below Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen; Number of samples above Water Quality Criteria for all other parameters.
FW = freshwater; SW = saltwater (marine). Values denoted with (*) indicate a proposed criterion, which has not yet been adopted.
Values denoted with (‡) are reference values based on EPA criteria (EPA 2010b), but the water body is not regulated by this standard.

2.7.25. Ribault River

2.7.25.1. About the Ribault River

Figure 2.54 The Ribault River Tributary (WBID 2224) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
Figure 2.54 The Ribault River Tributary (WBID 2224) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
      • Northwest of downtown Jacksonville
      • Primary Land Use: Residential
      • Current TMDL reports:
        Fecal Coliform
      • 2022 Verified Impairment for Nutrients (Macrophytes) (2224C) and Iron (2224A/2224B)
      • WBID Area: 9.7 sq. mi.
      • Beneficial Use: Class III F/M

      (2224A/B Recreational – Marine, 2224C Recreational – Freshwater)

2.7.25.2. Data sources

Data were historically downloaded from the FL STORET website (DEP 2010f), with recent data downloaded from WIN WAVES (DEP 2022f). Data were filtered based on the stations in the Ribault River WBIDs 2224A (marine), 2224B (marine), and 2224C (freshwater) (DEP 2023b) shown above. The filtered dataset reflects water column concentrations and was used to generate Table 2.30.

2.7.25.3. Discussion

Water quality data for the Ribault River are presented in Table 2.30. The Ribault River is located in a highly residential area, which has historically been a contributor to elevated levels of phosphorus found in the tributary. The average total phosphorus concentrations in the marine reach (2224A/B) fluctuated near the WQC in 2020, but no data were reported in WIN for 2021-2022.  Average chlorophyll­-a levels in the marine reach of the Ribault River exceeded the WQC in 2020, but no new measurements were reported 2021-2022.  The marine reach was verified impaired for nutrients (macrophytes) in 2022 (DEP 2022). The marine reach (2224A/B) was verified impaired for iron in 2022 (DEP 2022). Average levels of copper and iron in the marine reach of the Ribault River (2224A/B) exceeded their respective WQC in 2020, and iron levels again in 2022 (no data available 2021).

Historical fecal coliform levels were elevated. In 2014, the City of Jacksonville implemented a monitoring program for the Ribault River as part of a bacteria pollution control plan in concert with efforts related to stormwater management (COJ 2017); this plan was adopted in 2020. A TMDL report for fecal coliform in the Ribault River was published in 2006 (Wainwright 2006a), with a 50% reduction in contributing sources. (note: the data analyses in the TMDL are based on different criteria than those used in this report). Average fecal indicator bacteria concentrations and over half of the individual fecal indicator bacteria measurements from 2020-2022 were higher than the WQC.  In 2020, the Ribault River was added to FDEP’s study list to monitor the response in fecal coliform levels (E. coli in the freshwater portions and Enterococcus in the marine portions) to ongoing restoration activities taking place as part of the Bacterial Pollution Control Plan (DEP 2020f).

No recent measurements were available in WIN between 2020 and 2022 for the freshwater reach (2224C) for the following parameters: Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, Chlorophyll-a, Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Nickel, Silver, Zinc, Turbidity.

Historical water quality data for these parameters in the Ribault River are available in previous versions of the River Report.

Table 2.30 Water quality data for the Ribault River.

Water QualityAverage and Number of Samples º
ParameterCriteria (FW)202020212022
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)≥34% sat. (≥3.0)6.93
(1 of 8 samples)
7.18
(0 of 8 samples)
6.89 ± 0.48
(0 of 12 samples)
≥4.0 SW6.47
(3 of 44 samples)
7.01
(0 of 35 samples)
6.83 ± 0.19
(0 of 42 samples)
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)<1.54 SW0.89
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)<0.12 SW0.11
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)<5.4FW SWNot availableNot availableNot available
Arsenic (µg/L)≤50 SW1.08
(0 of 4 samples)
Not available0.78 ± 0.11
(0 of 4 samples)
Cadmium (µg/L)&#8+B8804;0.3 FWNot availableNot available0.01 ± 0.000
(0 of 4 samples)
Copper (µg/L)≤9.3 FWNot availableNot available1.84 ± 0.23
(0 of 4 samples)
Iron (mg/L)≤1.0 FWNot availableNot available0.66 ± 0.05
(4 of 4 samples)
Lead (µg/L)≤3.2FWNot availableNot available1.16 ± 0.24
(0 of 4 samples)
Nickel (µg/L)≤52 FWNot availableNot available1.25 ± 0.000
(0 of 4 samples)
Silver (µg/L)≤0.07 FWNot availableNot available0.00 ± 0.000
(0 of 4 samples)
Zinc (µg/L)≤120 FWNot availableNot available12.5 ± 0.000
(0 of 4 samples)
Fecal Indicator Bacteria (CFU/100 mL)E. coli <410 FW1870
(26 of 47 samples)
1460
(25 of 43 samples)
368 ± 103
(2 of 8 samples)
Enterococci <130 FW384
(1 of 1 samples)
E. coli <410 SW1728 ± 564
(15 of 22 samples)
Enterococci <130 SW177 ± 58
(6 of 11 samples)
Turbidity (NTU)<298.35
(0 of 4 samples)
Not availableNot available
Note: Hardness-dependent freshwater criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were generated based on a hardness concentration of 100 mg/L.
° = Number of samples below Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen; Number of samples above Water Quality Criteria for all other parameters.
FW = freshwater; SW = saltwater (marine). Values denoted with (*) indicate a proposed criterion, which has not yet been adopted.
Values denoted with (‡) are reference values based on EPA criteria (EPA 2010b), but the water body is not regulated by this standard.

2.7.30. Wills Branch

2.7.30.1.  About the Wills Branch

Figure 2.59 The Wills Branch Tributary (WBIDs 2282) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
Figure 2.59 The Wills Branch Tributary (WBIDs 2282) with sanitary sewer overflows reported by JEA in 2022 (JEA 2022b).
    • West of downtown Jacksonville
      Flows into the Cedar River
    • Primary Land Use: Residential
    • Current TMDL reports:
      Fecal Coliform with BMAP
    • Not included in 2022 Verified List of Impaired Waters
    • Beneficial Use: Class III F
      (Recreational – Freshwater)

2.7.30.2. Data sources

Data were historically downloaded from the FL STORET website (DEP 2010f), with recent data downloaded from WIN WAVES (DEP 2022f). Data were filtered based on the stations in the Wills Branch WBID 2282 (DEP 2023b) shown above.

2.7.30.3. Discussion

Water quality data for Wills Branch are presented in Table 2.34. Historically, average total phosphorus, dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-aconcentrations were within acceptable limits. Fecal coliform levels were historically above the WQC. As a result, a TMDL for total and fecal coliform was published in 2006 (Wainwright 2006c) for Wills Branch, with an 80% reduction in contributing sources. (Note: the data analyses in the TMDL are based on different criteria than those used in this report). Subsequently, a BMAP for Wills Branch was legally adopted in 2010 (DEP 2010a). Average fecal indicator bacteria levels were higher than the WQC 2020-2022. In 2018, FDEP piloted microbial source tracking strategies in selected impaired waterbodies.  They found that the strategies used could be used to narrow down areas suspected of containing sources that actively contribute fecal indicating bacteria to water in order to identify and remediate them, but this work is resource-intensive.  Wills Branch was found to have known sources of untreated human waste present (DEP 2019a).  In 2020, Wills Branch was added to FDEP’s study list to monitor the response in fecal coliform (E. coli) levels to ongoing restoration activities taking place as part of the existing BMAP (DEP 2020f). Additional information about fecal coliform in the tributaries can be found in Section 2.6 and Table 2.3.

Historical water quality data for these parameters in Wills Branch are available in previous versions of the River Report.

Table 2.34 Water quality data for Wills Branch.

Water QualityAverage and Number of Samples º
ParameterCriteria202020212022
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)≥34% sat. (≥3.0)5.36
(2 of 12 samples)
7.26
(0 of 16 samples)
6.58 ± 0.36
(0 of 16 samples)
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)<1.541.03
(1 of 7 samples)
0.87
(0 of 4 samples)
1.17 ± 0.10
(0 of 9 samples)
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)<0.120.12
(3 of 7 samples)
0.08
(1 of 11 samples)
0.08 ± 0.01
(0 of 9 samples)
Chlorophyll-a (µg/L)<204.26
(0 of 6 samples)
4.24
(0 of 9 samples)
2.52 ± 0.82
(0 of 8 samples)
Arsenic (µg/L)≤50Not available0.31
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Cadmium (µg/L)≤0.3Not available0.01
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Copper (µg/L)≤9.3Not available1.46
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Iron (µg/L)≤1.0Not availableNot included in
2022 SORR
Not available
Lead (µg/L)≤3.2Not available0.30
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Nickel (µg/L)≤52Not available0.25
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Silver (µg/L)≤0.07Not available0.01
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Zinc (µg/L)≤120Not available12.50
(0 of 1 sample)
Not available
Fecal Indicator Bacteria (CFU / 100 mL) E.coli <410730
(6 of 11 samples)
2060
(13 of 14 samples)
1458 ± 192
(8 of 8 samples)
Turbidity (NTU)<293
(0 of 6 samples)
3.78
(0 of 11 samples)
3.17 ± 0.34
(0 of 9 samples)
Note: Hardness-dependent freshwater criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were generated based on a hardness concentration of 100 mg/L.
° = Number of samples below Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen; Number of samples above Water Quality Criteria for all other parameters.
FW = freshwater; SW = saltwater (marine). Values denoted with (*) indicate a proposed criterion, which has not yet been adopted.
Values denoted with (‡) are reference values based on EPA criteria (EPA 2010b), but the water body is not regulated by this standard.

District Information

The links below will direct you to content that either is specific to the district you selected, or includes information on separate tributaries, so that you can view information on specific tributaries of interest to you.